<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tell Secretary Leavitt to Block New HHS Regulations on Contraception!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.populationmedia.org/2008/07/28/tell-secretary-leavitt-to-block-new-hhs-regulations-on-contraception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.populationmedia.org/2008/07/28/tell-secretary-leavitt-to-block-new-hhs-regulations-on-contraception/</link>
	<description>Acting for Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 06:34:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Salmony</title>
		<link>http://www.populationmedia.org/2008/07/28/tell-secretary-leavitt-to-block-new-hhs-regulations-on-contraception/comment-page-1/#comment-6826</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Salmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.populationmedia.org/2008/07/28/tell-secretary-leavitt-to-block-new-hhs-regulations-on-contraception/#comment-6826</guid>
		<description>Still ignoring the cause of the things that threaten the human community.


Based upon what we can see now, and understand from so many discussions in the Ecological Economics Blog, would it be correct to say unequivocally what is unspeakable: that an increasing food supply for the human species is the essential factor producing the recent skyrocketing increase of absolute global human population numbers?

Until this relationship is seen (ie, food is the independent variable and human population numbers is the dependent variable), and its implications understood and accepted, the human community cannot respond ably to the global challenges that are looming ominously on the far horizon, I believe.  The family of humanity will continue its necessary but insufficient projects at &quot;symptom mitigation&quot; of the global threats without ever taking hold of what is actually causing our difficulties and threatening our very existence.  We can identify the problem.  We are it.

If the skyrocketing growth of human numbers worldwide is THE number one problem to be confronted by the human community in our time, then ideas for humanely reducing human population numbers makes good sense, I suppose.

To have continuously denied the seminal work of Thomas Malthus and to have castigated the great scientists who have extended his thinking and improved our understanding; to have adamantly demanded that the relationship between food and human population numbers be seen conversely, will be acknowledged as the greatest failure of human perception in human history.  At least to me, the implications of this potentially catastrophic perceptual error (ie, human population numbers is the independent variable and food supply the dependent variable) appear to be profound and could have something to do with the existence of the culturally derived functional insanity in the thinking of the leaders of the global political economy and their manipulation of many minions in the mass media who are mainstreaming this primary misperception and other economically expedient and politcally convenient mistaken impressions to people everywhere.


Steven Earl Salmony
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,
established 2001
http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still ignoring the cause of the things that threaten the human community.</p>
<p>Based upon what we can see now, and understand from so many discussions in the Ecological Economics Blog, would it be correct to say unequivocally what is unspeakable: that an increasing food supply for the human species is the essential factor producing the recent skyrocketing increase of absolute global human population numbers?</p>
<p>Until this relationship is seen (ie, food is the independent variable and human population numbers is the dependent variable), and its implications understood and accepted, the human community cannot respond ably to the global challenges that are looming ominously on the far horizon, I believe.  The family of humanity will continue its necessary but insufficient projects at &#8220;symptom mitigation&#8221; of the global threats without ever taking hold of what is actually causing our difficulties and threatening our very existence.  We can identify the problem.  We are it.</p>
<p>If the skyrocketing growth of human numbers worldwide is THE number one problem to be confronted by the human community in our time, then ideas for humanely reducing human population numbers makes good sense, I suppose.</p>
<p>To have continuously denied the seminal work of Thomas Malthus and to have castigated the great scientists who have extended his thinking and improved our understanding; to have adamantly demanded that the relationship between food and human population numbers be seen conversely, will be acknowledged as the greatest failure of human perception in human history.  At least to me, the implications of this potentially catastrophic perceptual error (ie, human population numbers is the independent variable and food supply the dependent variable) appear to be profound and could have something to do with the existence of the culturally derived functional insanity in the thinking of the leaders of the global political economy and their manipulation of many minions in the mass media who are mainstreaming this primary misperception and other economically expedient and politcally convenient mistaken impressions to people everywhere.</p>
<p>Steven Earl Salmony<br />
AWAREness Campaign on The Human Population,<br />
established 2001<br />
<a href="http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://sustainabilitysoutheast.org/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
