COVID-19: PMC provides a trusted voice for high-risk global audiences. Learn More

Whom Can You Trust on Climate Change?

July 3, 2010 • Climate Change & Mitigation, Daily Email Recap

Thanks to Leta Finch for this article.
———————-

The public and the media, for the most part, have failed to address a key point of the climate debate. Before attempting to educate anyone about how to interpret temperature and carbon dioxide data, there needs to be a better understanding of how scientific studies undergo quality control before being released to the general public. This is especially important in light of last week’s leak of controversial e-mails from prominent climate scientists.

The peer-review publication process is the mechanism the scientific community uses to prevent bad science, that is, to prevent data obtained with questionable methods or incorrect interpretations of data from being published. Solid science benefits from objective critical review, which can result in improved methods and more insightful interpretation of data. There is a body of literature, the peer-reviewed scientific journals, where the very best in scientific data and new discoveries gets published after being evaluated by independent experts working on similar or related problems in the same field.

For full article,visit:
http://www.insidehighered.com/layout/set/print/views/2009/12/08/johnson


Current World Population

7,785,667,907

Net Growth During Your Visit

0

DonateNow