No Undue Burden? What Texas’ HB 2 Means for Maria

October 5, 2014 • Daily Email Recap

No Undue Burden? What Texas’ HB 2 Means for Maria 

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans has ruled that the State of Texas can now enforce HB 2, the omnibus anti-choice law that mandates that legal abortion facilities meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centers and that doctors who provide abortions have admitting privileges at local hospitals. HB 2was opposed as medically unnecessary-and even dangerous-by state- and national-level major medical associations. Anti-choice lawmakers claimed, against all evidence to the contrary, that HB 2 would increase the “health and safety” of Texans who seek legal abortion care.
The law also bans abortion after 20 weeks, and severely limits the provision of medication abortion.
In light of this ruling, here are the burdens women like Maria will face.
Maria* is a representative 26-year-old woman living in Harlingen, Texas, who finds herself pregnant. She is unable to have another child right now.
Maria works full time-more often, up to 60 hours a week-for minimum wage at a laundromat in Harlingen about 30 miles from Matamoros, Mexico. Before anti-choice lawmakers passed HB 2, she could have accessed legal abortion care near her home in Harlingen, or traveled 40 minutes away to McAllen for similarly safe, legal abortion care.


Current World Population


Net Growth During Your Visit